📘 Class 10 Heredity and Evolution NCERT Solutions
Class 10 Heredity and Evolution — NCERT Solutions
NCERT Class 10 Science(a) TTWW
(b) TTww
(c) TtWW
(d) TtWw
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Explanation:
Let's analyze step by step:
Traits:
• Tall (T) = dominant, Short (t) = recessive
• Violet flowers (W) = dominant, White flowers (w) = recessive
Observations in progeny (F1 generation):
1. All plants have violet flowers → Violet is dominant and tall parent is homozygous for violet (WW)
2. Almost half are short → Tall parent must be heterozygous for height (Tt)
Cross: Tall violet (TtWW) × Short white (ttww)
Gametes from tall parent: TW, tW
Gametes from short parent: tw only
Progeny: TtWw (tall violet) and ttWw (short violet) in 1:1 ratio
Exactly matches observation: all violet, half tall, half short.
Other options:
(a) TTWW × ttww → all TtWw (all tall violet) ❌
(b) TTww × ttww → all Ttww (all tall white) ❌
(d) TtWw × ttww → four types in equal ratio ❌
(a) our arm and a dog's fore-leg.
(b) our teeth and an elephant's tusks.
(c) potato and runners of grass.
(d) all of the above.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Explanation:
Homologous organs have similar basic structure and embryonic origin but different functions, indicating common ancestry.
Analysis of each option:
1. Our arm and dog's fore-leg: Both have humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, metacarpals, and phalanges (same bone structure) but different functions (grasping vs walking).
2. Our teeth and elephant's tusks: Both are modified teeth (incisors) but serve different functions (chewing vs defense/digging).
3. Potato (tuber) and grass runners (stolon): Both are modified stems for vegetative propagation but look different.
Contrast with analogous organs: Similar function but different structure/origin (e.g., wings of birds and insects).
(a) a Chinese school-boy.
(b) a chimpanzee.
(c) a spider.
(d) a bacterium.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Explanation:
Evolutionary closeness is determined by:
1. Common ancestry (recent common ancestor)
2. Genetic similarity
3. Morphological and physiological similarities
Order of closeness to humans:
1. Chinese school-boy: Same species (Homo sapiens) → 99.9% genetic similarity
2. Chimpanzee: Different species but same family (Hominidae) → ~98% genetic similarity
3. Spider: Different phylum (Arthropoda) → very distant
4. Bacterium: Different domain (Prokaryota) → most distant
All humans regardless of ethnicity/geography share the same evolutionary lineage from Africa ~200,000 years ago. Race is a social construct with no biological basis for species separation.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
No, we cannot determine dominance/recessiveness from this information alone.
Reason:
The observation only shows correlation, not inheritance pattern. Several possibilities exist:
Scenario 1 (Light eyes recessive):
If light eyes (l) are recessive and dark eyes (L) dominant:
• Both parents could be heterozygous (Ll) or homozygous recessive (ll)
• ll × ll → all ll (light-eyed children)
• Ll × Ll → 25% ll (light-eyed children possible)
Scenario 2 (Light eyes dominant):
If light eyes (L) are dominant and dark eyes (l) recessive:
• Parents could be homozygous dominant (LL) or heterozygous (Ll)
• LL × LL → all LL (light-eyed children)
• Ll × Ll → 75% light-eyed children possible
To determine dominance: We need:
1. Cross between pure-breeding light and dark-eyed parents
2. Observation of F1 and F2 generations
3. Statistical ratios in progeny
Note: Eye color inheritance is actually polygenic (multiple genes), not simple Mendelian, but the principle remains: single-generation observation is insufficient.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Evolution and classification are fundamentally interconnected:
| How Classification Reflects Evolution | How Evolution Informs Classification |
|---|---|
| Hierarchy shows evolutionary relationships: Kingdom → Phylum → Class → Order → Family → Genus → Species represents increasing closeness of common ancestry | Common ancestry determines grouping: Organisms sharing more recent common ancestors are placed in same/similar taxa |
| Homologous structures = same taxon: Similar anatomical structures indicate common origin (e.g., vertebrate limbs) | Evolutionary trees = classification maps: Phylogenetic trees visually represent both evolutionary history and classification |
| Fossil records connect classification: Transitional fossils show links between different classified groups | DNA sequencing confirms/reveals relationships: Molecular phylogeny uses genetic similarities to refine classification |
| Embryological similarities: Similar embryonic development patterns in related classified groups | Speciation events = new species in classification: When evolution produces reproductive isolation, new species are recognized |
Modern classification (phylogenetic system) is explicitly based on evolutionary relationships, unlike older artificial systems based only on observable traits.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
| Aspect | Homologous Organs | Analogous Organs |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Organs with similar basic structure and embryonic origin but different functions | Organs with similar functions but different structure and embryonic origin |
| Evolutionary Significance | Indicate common ancestry (divergent evolution) | Indicate adaptation to similar environment (convergent evolution) |
| Genetic Basis | Similar genes/developmental pathways | Different genes/developmental pathways |
| Examples |
• Forelimbs: Human arm, bat wing, whale flipper, horse leg (all have humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, metacarpals, phalanges) • Plant stems: Potato tuber, ginger rhizome, onion bulb, cactus spine • Mouthparts: Butterfly proboscis and mosquito proboscis |
• Wings: Bird wing (feathers on forearm) vs insect wing (chitinous membrane) vs bat wing (skin stretched between fingers) • Eyes: Octopus eye (from skin) vs vertebrate eye (from brain) • Fins: Fish fin (bony rays) vs penguin flipper (modified limb) • Sweet potato (root) vs potato (stem): Both store food but different origins |
| Visual Clue | Look different but have similar bone/structural plan | Look/function similar but have different structural plans |
Memory tip: "Homologous = same origin, different job; Analogous = same job, different origin."
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Project: Determining Dominant Coat Color in Dogs
Objective: To identify whether black coat color or brown coat color is dominant in a specific dog breed.
Materials Needed:
• Pure-breeding black dogs (if available)
• Pure-breeding brown dogs (if available)
• Records of parent and offspring coat colors
• Camera for documentation
• Notebook for data recording
Procedure (Mendelian Approach):
Step 1: Establish pure lines
• Identify dogs that consistently produce only black or only brown puppies when bred with similar-colored mates for multiple generations.
Step 2: Perform cross 1 (Parental generation)
• Cross pure-breeding black dog with pure-breeding brown dog.
• Record coat colors of all F1 puppies.
Step 3: Analyze F1 results
• If all F1 are black → black is dominant, brown is recessive.
• If all F1 are brown → brown is dominant, black is recessive.
• If mixed → incomplete dominance or other pattern.
Step 4: Perform cross 2 (F1 self-cross)
• Breed F1 dogs with each other.
• Record coat colors of F2 puppies.
• Expected ratio if simple dominance: 3:1 (dominant:recessive).
Step 5: Perform test cross
• Cross F1 black dogs with pure-breeding brown dogs.
• Expected ratio if black dominant: 1:1 (black:brown).
Data Recording:
• Maintain pedigree charts
• Photograph parents and offspring
• Record litter sizes and colors
• Note any exceptions or variations
Expected Outcomes & Interpretation:
• Black dominant: F1 all black; F2 3 black:1 brown; test cross 1:1
• Brown dominant: F1 all brown; F2 3 brown:1 black; test cross 1:1
• Incomplete dominance: F1 all intermediate (gray); F2 1:2:1
Real-world considerations: Dog coat color is often controlled by multiple genes (polygenic), so results may not follow simple Mendelian ratios. The project should focus on a specific breed to minimize genetic variability.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Fossils are crucial evidence for evolutionary relationships because they:
| Role of Fossils | How It Helps Determine Evolutionary Relationships | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Provide Historical Record | Show organisms that lived in past, documenting life's history over billions of years | Stromatolites (3.5 billion years old) show early life |
| Reveal Transitional Forms | Show intermediate characteristics between different groups, indicating evolutionary links | Archaeopteryx (dinosaur-bird), Tiktaalik (fish-amphibian) |
| Establish Chronological Sequence | Deeper fossils = older; shows progression from simple to complex forms over time | Fish → amphibians → reptiles → mammals in rock layers |
| Show Anatomical Changes | Document gradual modifications in structures over generations | Horse evolution: small multi-toed → large single-hoofed |
| Indicate Geographical Distribution | Show how species spread/migrated, explaining current distributions | Similar fossils in South America and Africa support continental drift |
| Provide Absolute Dating | Radioisotope dating gives actual ages, creating evolutionary timelines | Carbon-14 dating of human fossils |
| Document Extinctions | Show species that no longer exist, indicating evolutionary dead ends or mass extinctions | Dinosaur fossils show dominance and extinction |
Limitations: Fossil record is incomplete (rare conditions for preservation), but even partial records provide compelling evidence for evolution and help reconstruct phylogenetic trees.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Evidence for chemical evolution (abiogenesis) - life from non-living matter:
| Evidence Type | Description | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Miller-Urey Experiment (1953) | Simulated early Earth conditions (methane, ammonia, hydrogen, water vapor, electric sparks). Produced amino acids, sugars, nitrogen bases - building blocks of life. | Showed organic molecules can form from inorganic precursors under plausible early Earth conditions. |
| Chemical Analysis of Meteorites | Carbonaceous chondrites (meteorites) contain amino acids, purines, pyrimidines - same as Earth life. | Suggests organic molecules form in space; life's building blocks may have extraterrestrial origin or be universal. |
| Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Research | Vents provide energy, minerals, and protected environments where organic synthesis occurs. | Alternative to "primordial soup" theory; vents could be life's cradle. |
| Formation of Microspheres & Coacervates | When proteins/lipids are shaken, they form membrane-bound spheres resembling primitive cells. | Shows how protocells (pre-cells) could form spontaneously. |
| RNA World Hypothesis Evidence | RNA can store information AND catalyze reactions; ribozymes (RNA enzymes) exist. | Suggests RNA preceded DNA/proteins as first self-replicating molecule. |
| Oldest Fossils | Stromatolites (3.5 billion years old) and microfossils show life existed soon after Earth cooled. | Indicates rapid emergence of life once conditions permitted. |
| Universal Genetic Code | All life uses same DNA→RNA→protein system with minor variations. | Suggests single origin event from which all life descended. |
Current understanding: Life likely arose through gradual chemical evolution: inorganic → simple organic → complex organic → self-replicating molecules → protocells → true cells. The exact steps are still being researched.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Part 1: Why sexual reproduction produces more variations:
| Mechanism in Sexual Reproduction | How It Creates Variation |
|---|---|
| Genetic Recombination | Crossing over during meiosis shuffles genes between homologous chromosomes |
| Independent Assortment | Random alignment of chromosomes during meiosis creates 2n possible gamete combinations (n=haploid number) |
| Fertilization (Random Fusion) | Any sperm can fertilize any egg → astronomical number of possible zygotes |
| Diploidy | Two copies of each gene allow recessive traits to be preserved and reappear in new combinations |
| Mutation Accumulation | Mutations from both parents combine in offspring |
Contrast with asexual reproduction:
• Only source of variation = DNA copying errors (mutations)
• Mutations accumulate slowly
• All offspring are clones (except for rare mutations)
• No gene mixing/recombination
Part 2: Evolutionary consequences for sexually reproducing organisms:
| Evolutionary Advantage | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Faster Adaptation | New gene combinations tested every generation → rapid response to environmental changes |
| Disease Resistance | Genetic diversity prevents pathogens from wiping out entire population |
| Elimination of Harmful Mutations | Recombination can separate harmful mutations from beneficial genes |
| Evolution of Complex Traits | Allows accumulation of multiple beneficial mutations in same lineage |
| Speciation | Genetic diversity provides raw material for reproductive isolation and new species formation |
| Long-term Survival | Populations withstand environmental fluctuations better |
Trade-off: Sexual reproduction is energetically costly and requires finding mates, but the variation benefits outweigh costs in changing environments.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
Equal genetic contribution is ensured through specific biological mechanisms:
| Mechanism | How It Ensures Equal Contribution |
|---|---|
| Meiosis (Gamete Formation) | Both parents produce haploid gametes (sperm/egg) with exactly half the chromosome number (n). During meiosis I, chromosome pairs separate randomly. |
| Fertilization | Fusion of haploid sperm (n) and haploid egg (n) restores diploid number (2n) in zygote. One set from father, one from mother. |
| Chromosome Inheritance | Autosomes (22 pairs in humans): One from each parent for each pair. Sex chromosomes: X from mother, X or Y from father. |
| DNA Content | Each gamete contributes ~3 billion base pairs of DNA in humans. Mitochondrial DNA is exception (maternal only). |
| Gene Copy Number | For each gene (except sex-linked), offspring inherit one allele from mother and one from father. |
| Random Assortment | Which parental chromosome goes to which gamete is random, but exactly 50% of chromosomes come from each parent. |
Visual Example (Humans):
• Parent cells: 46 chromosomes (23 pairs) each
• Gametes: 23 chromosomes each (after meiosis)
• Zygote: 46 chromosomes (23 from mother + 23 from father)
Exception to equal contribution:
1. Mitochondrial DNA: Inherited only from mother (in egg cytoplasm)
2. Cytoplasmic factors: Egg contributes cytoplasm, sperm contributes almost none
3. Genomic imprinting: Some genes expressed differently depending on parental origin
Significance: Equal contribution ensures genetic diversity, prevents doubling of DNA each generation, and allows for Mendelian inheritance patterns.
✅ Answer & Explanation:
No, I do not fully agree with this statement. While advantageous variations are more likely to survive, other variations can also persist in populations.
| Type of Variation | Survival in Population | Reason/Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Advantageous Variations | Most likely to survive and spread | Natural selection favors traits that increase survival/reproduction (e.g., antibiotic resistance in bacteria) |
| Neutral Variations | Can survive and persist | No effect on fitness; not selected for or against (e.g., attached vs free earlobes in humans) |
| Slightly Disadvantageous Variations | May survive in certain conditions | If disadvantage is small and population is large, may persist through genetic drift |
| Recessive Harmful Variations | Can survive in heterozygotes | Carriers don't show symptoms; eliminated only when homozygous (e.g., sickle cell trait in malaria zones) |
| Variations with Context-Dependent Effects | Survive in some environments | Traits advantageous in one environment may be neutral/disadvantageous in another (e.g., dark fur in cold vs hot climates) |
| Variations Preserved by Genetic Drift | Can survive by chance | In small populations, random events can fix neutral or slightly harmful traits (founder effect, bottleneck) |
Key Concepts:
1. Natural Selection: Acts on variations, but not all variations are subject to selection.
2. Genetic Drift: Random changes in gene frequencies, especially in small populations.
3. Neutral Theory: Many molecular variations are neutral and evolve by drift, not selection.
4. Balancing Selection: Maintains variation (e.g., heterozygote advantage in sickle cell anemia).
Example: The beetle example from NCERT:
• Green beetles survive better (advantageous) → natural selection
• Blue beetles survive by chance after elephant stampede (neutral/random) → genetic drift
Conclusion: While advantageous variations have higher survival probability, variations can persist through other mechanisms too. Evolution is driven by both natural selection AND genetic drift.
📘 How to Use This Exercise Widget
Each question block contains a "Show Answer" button. Click it to reveal the detailed answer. Only one answer is shown at a time — opening a new answer will hide the previous one. These solutions cover Mendelian genetics, DNA inheritance, evolution, speciation, and evidence for evolution.