Chapter 9: Heredity and Evolution
NCERT Class 10 Science Exercise Solutions
How to Use This Exercise Widget
Each question block contains a "Show Answer" button. Click it to reveal the detailed answer. Only one answer is shown at a time — opening a new answer will hide the previous one. These solutions cover Mendelian genetics, DNA inheritance, evolution, speciation, and evidence for evolution.
A Mendelian experiment consisted of breeding tall pea plants bearing violet flowers with short pea plants bearing white flowers. The progeny all bore violet flowers, but almost half of them were short. This suggests that the genetic make-up of the tall parent can be depicted as
(a) TTWW
(b) TTww
(c) TtWW
(d) TtWw
Explanation:
Let's analyze step by step:
Traits:
• Tall (T) = dominant, Short (t) = recessive
• Violet flowers (W) = dominant, White flowers (w) = recessive
Observations in progeny (F1 generation):
1. All plants have violet flowers → Violet is dominant and tall parent is homozygous for violet (WW)
2. Almost half are short → Tall parent must be heterozygous for height (Tt)
Cross: Tall violet (TtWW) × Short white (ttww)
Gametes from tall parent: TW, tW
Gametes from short parent: tw only
Progeny: TtWw (tall violet) and ttWw (short violet) in 1:1 ratio
Exactly matches observation: all violet, half tall, half short.
Other options:
(a) TTWW × ttww → all TtWw (all tall violet) ❌
(b) TTww × ttww → all Ttww (all tall white) ❌
(d) TtWw × ttww → four types in equal ratio ❌
An example of homologous organs is
(a) our arm and a dog's fore-leg.
(b) our teeth and an elephant's tusks.
(c) potato and runners of grass.
(d) all of the above.
Explanation:
Homologous organs have similar basic structure and embryonic origin but different functions, indicating common ancestry.
Analysis of each option:
1. Our arm and dog's fore-leg: Both have humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, metacarpals, and phalanges (same bone structure) but different functions (grasping vs walking).
2. Our teeth and elephant's tusks: Both are modified teeth (incisors) but serve different functions (chewing vs defense/digging).
3. Potato (tuber) and grass runners (stolon): Both are modified stems for vegetative propagation but look different.
Contrast with analogous organs: Similar function but different structure/origin (e.g., wings of birds and insects).
In evolutionary terms, we have more in common with
(a) a Chinese school-boy.
(b) a chimpanzee.
(c) a spider.
(d) a bacterium.
Explanation:
Evolutionary closeness is determined by:
1. Common ancestry (recent common ancestor)
2. Genetic similarity
3. Morphological and physiological similarities
Order of closeness to humans:
1. Chinese school-boy: Same species (Homo sapiens) → 99.9% genetic similarity
2. Chimpanzee: Different species but same family (Hominidae) → ~98% genetic similarity
3. Spider: Different phylum (Arthropoda) → very distant
4. Bacterium: Different domain (Prokaryota) → most distant
All humans regardless of ethnicity/geography share the same evolutionary lineage from Africa ~200,000 years ago. Race is a social construct with no biological basis for species separation.
A study found that children with light-coloured eyes are likely to have parents with light-coloured eyes. On this basis, can we say anything about whether the light eye colour trait is dominant or recessive? Why or why not?
No, we cannot determine dominance/recessiveness from this information alone.
Reason:
The observation only shows correlation, not inheritance pattern. Several possibilities exist:
Scenario 1 (Light eyes recessive):
If light eyes (l) are recessive and dark eyes (L) dominant:
• Both parents could be heterozygous (Ll) or homozygous recessive (ll)
• ll × ll → all ll (light-eyed children)
• Ll × Ll → 25% ll (light-eyed children possible)
Scenario 2 (Light eyes dominant):
If light eyes (L) are dominant and dark eyes (l) recessive:
• Parents could be homozygous dominant (LL) or heterozygous (Ll)
• LL × LL → all LL (light-eyed children)
• Ll × Ll → 75% light-eyed children possible
To determine dominance: We need:
1. Cross between pure-breeding light and dark-eyed parents
2. Observation of F1 and F2 generations
3. Statistical ratios in progeny
Note: Eye color inheritance is actually polygenic (multiple genes), not simple Mendelian, but the principle remains: single-generation observation is insufficient.
How are the areas of study – evolution and classification – interlinked?
Evolution and classification are fundamentally interconnected:
| How Classification Reflects Evolution | How Evolution Informs Classification |
|---|---|
| Hierarchy shows evolutionary relationships: Kingdom → Phylum → Class → Order → Family → Genus → Species represents increasing closeness of common ancestry | Common ancestry determines grouping: Organisms sharing more recent common ancestors are placed in same/similar taxa |
| Homologous structures = same taxon: Similar anatomical structures indicate common origin (e.g., vertebrate limbs) | Evolutionary trees = classification maps: Phylogenetic trees visually represent both evolutionary history and classification |
| Fossil records connect classification: Transitional fossils show links between different classified groups | DNA sequencing confirms/reveals relationships: Molecular phylogeny uses genetic similarities to refine classification |
| Embryological similarities: Similar embryonic development patterns in related classified groups | Speciation events = new species in classification: When evolution produces reproductive isolation, new species are recognized |
Modern classification (phylogenetic system) is explicitly based on evolutionary relationships, unlike older artificial systems based only on observable traits.
Explain the terms analogous and homologous organs with examples.
| Aspect | Homologous Organs | Analogous Organs |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Organs with similar basic structure and embryonic origin but different functions | Organs with similar functions but different structure and embryonic origin |
| Evolutionary Significance | Indicate common ancestry (divergent evolution) | Indicate adaptation to similar environment (convergent evolution) |
| Genetic Basis | Similar genes/developmental pathways | Different genes/developmental pathways |
| Examples |
• Forelimbs: Human arm, bat wing, whale flipper, horse leg (all have humerus, radius, ulna, carpals, metacarpals, phalanges) • Plant stems: Potato tuber, ginger rhizome, onion bulb, cactus spine • Mouthparts: Butterfly proboscis and mosquito proboscis |
• Wings: Bird wing (feathers on forearm) vs insect wing (chitinous membrane) vs bat wing (skin stretched between fingers) • Eyes: Octopus eye (from skin) vs vertebrate eye (from brain) • Fins: Fish fin (bony rays) vs penguin flipper (modified limb) • Sweet potato (root) vs potato (stem): Both store food but different origins |
| Visual Clue | Look different but have similar bone/structural plan | Look/function similar but have different structural plans |
Memory tip: "Homologous = same origin, different job; Analogous = same job, different origin."
Outline a project which aims to find the dominant coat colour in dogs.
Project: Determining Dominant Coat Color in Dogs
Objective: To identify whether black coat color or brown coat color is dominant in a specific dog breed.
Materials Needed:
• Pure-breeding black dogs (if available)
• Pure-breeding brown dogs (if available)
• Records of parent and offspring coat colors
• Camera for documentation
• Notebook for data recording
Procedure (Mendelian Approach):
Step 1: Establish pure lines
• Identify dogs that consistently produce only black or only brown puppies when bred with similar-colored mates for multiple generations.
Step 2: Perform cross 1 (Parental generation)
• Cross pure-breeding black dog with pure-breeding brown dog.
• Record coat colors of all F1 puppies.
Step 3: Analyze F1 results
• If all F1 are black → black is dominant, brown is recessive.
• If all F1 are brown → brown is dominant, black is recessive.
• If mixed → incomplete dominance or other pattern.
Step 4: Perform cross 2 (F1 self-cross)
• Breed F1 dogs with each other.
• Record coat colors of F2 puppies.
• Expected ratio if simple dominance: 3:1 (dominant:recessive).
Step 5: Perform test cross
• Cross F1 black dogs with pure-breeding brown dogs.
• Expected ratio if black dominant: 1:1 (black:brown).
Data Recording:
• Maintain pedigree charts
• Photograph parents and offspring
• Record litter sizes and colors
• Note any exceptions or variations
Expected Outcomes & Interpretation:
• Black dominant: F1 all black; F2 3 black:1 brown; test cross 1:1
• Brown dominant: F1 all brown; F2 3 brown:1 black; test cross 1:1
• Incomplete dominance: F1 all intermediate (gray); F2 1:2:1
Real-world considerations: Dog coat color is often controlled by multiple genes (polygenic), so results may not follow simple Mendelian ratios. The project should focus on a specific breed to minimize genetic variability.
Explain the importance of fossils in deciding evolutionary relationships.
Fossils are crucial evidence for evolutionary relationships because they:
| Role of Fossils | How It Helps Determine Evolutionary Relationships | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Provide Historical Record | Show organisms that lived in past, documenting life's history over billions of years | Stromatolites (3.5 billion years old) show early life |
| Reveal Transitional Forms | Show intermediate characteristics between different groups, indicating evolutionary links | Archaeopteryx (dinosaur-bird), Tiktaalik (fish-amphibian) |
| Establish Chronological Sequence | Deeper fossils = older; shows progression from simple to complex forms over time | Fish → amphibians → reptiles → mammals in rock layers |
| Show Anatomical Changes | Document gradual modifications in structures over generations | Horse evolution: small multi-toed → large single-hoofed |
| Indicate Geographical Distribution | Show how species spread/migrated, explaining current distributions | Similar fossils in South America and Africa support continental drift |
| Provide Absolute Dating | Radioisotope dating gives actual ages, creating evolutionary timelines | Carbon-14 dating of human fossils |
| Document Extinctions | Show species that no longer exist, indicating evolutionary dead ends or mass extinctions | Dinosaur fossils show dominance and extinction |
Limitations: Fossil record is incomplete (rare conditions for preservation), but even partial records provide compelling evidence for evolution and help reconstruct phylogenetic trees.
What evidence do we have for the origin of life from inanimate matter?
Evidence for chemical evolution (abiogenesis) - life from non-living matter:
| Evidence Type | Description | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Miller-Urey Experiment (1953) | Simulated early Earth conditions (methane, ammonia, hydrogen, water vapor, electric sparks). Produced amino acids, sugars, nitrogen bases - building blocks of life. | Showed organic molecules can form from inorganic precursors under plausible early Earth conditions. |
| Chemical Analysis of Meteorites | Carbonaceous chondrites (meteorites) contain amino acids, purines, pyrimidines - same as Earth life. | Suggests organic molecules form in space; life's building blocks may have extraterrestrial origin or be universal. |
| Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Research | Vents provide energy, minerals, and protected environments where organic synthesis occurs. | Alternative to "primordial soup" theory; vents could be life's cradle. |
| Formation of Microspheres & Coacervates | When proteins/lipids are shaken, they form membrane-bound spheres resembling primitive cells. | Shows how protocells (pre-cells) could form spontaneously. |
| RNA World Hypothesis Evidence | RNA can store information AND catalyze reactions; ribozymes (RNA enzymes) exist. | Suggests RNA preceded DNA/proteins as first self-replicating molecule. |
| Oldest Fossils | Stromatolites (3.5 billion years old) and microfossils show life existed soon after Earth cooled. | Indicates rapid emergence of life once conditions permitted. |
| Universal Genetic Code | All life uses same DNA→RNA→protein system with minor variations. | Suggests single origin event from which all life descended. |
Current understanding: Life likely arose through gradual chemical evolution: inorganic → simple organic → complex organic → self-replicating molecules → protocells → true cells. The exact steps are still being researched.
Explain how sexual reproduction gives rise to more viable variations than asexual reproduction. How does this affect the evolution of those organisms that reproduce sexually?
Part 1: Why sexual reproduction produces more variations:
| Mechanism in Sexual Reproduction | How It Creates Variation |
|---|---|
| Genetic Recombination | Crossing over during meiosis shuffles genes between homologous chromosomes |
| Independent Assortment | Random alignment of chromosomes during meiosis creates 2n possible gamete combinations (n=haploid number) |
| Fertilization (Random Fusion) | Any sperm can fertilize any egg → astronomical number of possible zygotes |
| Diploidy | Two copies of each gene allow recessive traits to be preserved and reappear in new combinations |
| Mutation Accumulation | Mutations from both parents combine in offspring |
Contrast with asexual reproduction:
• Only source of variation = DNA copying errors (mutations)
• Mutations accumulate slowly
• All offspring are clones (except for rare mutations)
• No gene mixing/recombination
Part 2: Evolutionary consequences for sexually reproducing organisms:
| Evolutionary Advantage | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Faster Adaptation | New gene combinations tested every generation → rapid response to environmental changes |
| Disease Resistance | Genetic diversity prevents pathogens from wiping out entire population |
| Elimination of Harmful Mutations | Recombination can separate harmful mutations from beneficial genes |
| Evolution of Complex Traits | Allows accumulation of multiple beneficial mutations in same lineage |
| Speciation | Genetic diversity provides raw material for reproductive isolation and new species formation |
| Long-term Survival | Populations withstand environmental fluctuations better |
Trade-off: Sexual reproduction is energetically costly and requires finding mates, but the variation benefits outweigh costs in changing environments.
How is the equal genetic contribution of male and female parents ensured in the progeny?
Equal genetic contribution is ensured through specific biological mechanisms:
| Mechanism | How It Ensures Equal Contribution |
|---|---|
| Meiosis (Gamete Formation) | Both parents produce haploid gametes (sperm/egg) with exactly half the chromosome number (n). During meiosis I, chromosome pairs separate randomly. |
| Fertilization | Fusion of haploid sperm (n) and haploid egg (n) restores diploid number (2n) in zygote. One set from father, one from mother. |
| Chromosome Inheritance | Autosomes (22 pairs in humans): One from each parent for each pair. Sex chromosomes: X from mother, X or Y from father. |
| DNA Content | Each gamete contributes ~3 billion base pairs of DNA in humans. Mitochondrial DNA is exception (maternal only). |
| Gene Copy Number | For each gene (except sex-linked), offspring inherit one allele from mother and one from father. |
| Random Assortment | Which parental chromosome goes to which gamete is random, but exactly 50% of chromosomes come from each parent. |
Visual Example (Humans):
• Parent cells: 46 chromosomes (23 pairs) each
• Gametes: 23 chromosomes each (after meiosis)
• Zygote: 46 chromosomes (23 from mother + 23 from father)
Exception to equal contribution:
1. Mitochondrial DNA: Inherited only from mother (in egg cytoplasm)
2. Cytoplasmic factors: Egg contributes cytoplasm, sperm contributes almost none
3. Genomic imprinting: Some genes expressed differently depending on parental origin
Significance: Equal contribution ensures genetic diversity, prevents doubling of DNA each generation, and allows for Mendelian inheritance patterns.
Only variations that confer an advantage to an individual organism will survive in a population. Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?
No, I do not fully agree with this statement. While advantageous variations are more likely to survive, other variations can also persist in populations.
| Type of Variation | Survival in Population | Reason/Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Advantageous Variations | Most likely to survive and spread | Natural selection favors traits that increase survival/reproduction (e.g., antibiotic resistance in bacteria) |
| Neutral Variations | Can survive and persist | No effect on fitness; not selected for or against (e.g., attached vs free earlobes in humans) |
| Slightly Disadvantageous Variations | May survive in certain conditions | If disadvantage is small and population is large, may persist through genetic drift |
| Recessive Harmful Variations | Can survive in heterozygotes | Carriers don't show symptoms; eliminated only when homozygous (e.g., sickle cell trait in malaria zones) |
| Variations with Context-Dependent Effects | Survive in some environments | Traits advantageous in one environment may be neutral/disadvantageous in another (e.g., dark fur in cold vs hot climates) |
| Variations Preserved by Genetic Drift | Can survive by chance | In small populations, random events can fix neutral or slightly harmful traits (founder effect, bottleneck) |
Key Concepts:
1. Natural Selection: Acts on variations, but not all variations are subject to selection.
2. Genetic Drift: Random changes in gene frequencies, especially in small populations.
3. Neutral Theory: Many molecular variations are neutral and evolve by drift, not selection.
4. Balancing Selection: Maintains variation (e.g., heterozygote advantage in sickle cell anemia).
Example: The beetle example from NCERT:
• Green beetles survive better (advantageous) → natural selection
• Blue beetles survive by chance after elephant stampede (neutral/random) → genetic drift
Conclusion: While advantageous variations have higher survival probability, variations can persist through other mechanisms too. Evolution is driven by both natural selection AND genetic drift.
moccasin-wasp-330807.hostingersite.com - Launching For Your Exam Success